- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:40:04 +0100
- To: "Mark A. Matienzo" <mark.matienzo@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+8am2YTx5DiviRD96ZdVm4vpOAHis8y6Xa6US-+=C4qA@mail.gmail.com>
On 30 November 2017 at 19:49, Mark A. Matienzo <mark.matienzo@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > In case you have not seen, a specification is coming out of the Fedora > digital repositories community (http://fedorarepository.org/) which > extends from the LDP 1.0 Recommendation. > > There may be synergistic value in potentially bringing some of the > elements in the Fedora specification into the LDP effort, such as: > * Resource Versioning (Memento) > * Resource Authorization (Web Access Controls) > * Notifications (Activity Streams) > * Extended Binary Resource Operations > ** Fixity (HTTP headers) > ** Referenced Content via message/external-body Content-Type > > Please indicate if you have an interest in incorporating any of the above > into the LDP-Next effort or creating a more explicit connection between > these standards. > Hi Mark Thanks for sharing. I havent read through the whole spec yet. But I suspect the Web Access Control part will be of interest to some in this group. > > Regards, > Andrew Woods > > ****** Announcement below ****** > > The Candidate Recommendation of the Fedora API Specification is now > available for public review. > > https://fedora.info/spec > > As described in the charter [1], this specification is designed to: > 1. Define the characteristics and expectations of how clients interact > with Fedora implementations > 2. Define such interactions such that an implementation’s conformance is > testable > 3. Enable interoperability by striving to minimize the need for > modifications to client applications in order to work with different > implementations of the Fedora API specification > > The core HTTP and notification services defined in this specification are > listed below, along with the associated standards from which they are > derived: > * Resource Management (Linked Data Platform) > * Resource Versioning (Memento) > * Resource Authorization (Web Access Controls) > * Notifications (Activity Streams) > * Extended Binary Resource Operations > ** Fixity (HTTP headers) > ** Referenced Content via message/external-body Content-Type > > This announcement for public comment on the Candidate Recommendation marks > the beginning of a projected two-month period within which time we are > targeting the release of the full Recommendation. Minimum requirements for > transitioning to releasing the Recommendation include: > * Specification compliance test suite > * Two or more implementations of the specification > * No unresolved, outstanding critical issues, as defined by the > specification editors [2] > > Please contact the Fedora Community [3] or Fedora Specification Editors > [4] with any general comments. Any comments on details of the > specification, itself, should be posted as GitHub issues [5]. > > Regards, > Andrew Woods (on behalf of the Specification Editors and the Fedora > Leadership) > > [1] https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/wiki/Fedora-A > PI-Specification-Charter#fedora-api-specification-charter > [2] https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/wiki/Fedora-A > PI-Specification-Charter#editorial-team-membership-and-selection > [3] fedora-community@googlegroups.com > [4] fedora-specification-editors@googlegroups.com > [5] https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues > > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2017 16:40:28 UTC