Re: Schema Markup Documents ie: .bot files

<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context": "http://example.org",
"@type": "Whatever", ... }</script> seems good enough for the use cases
I've encountered in production so far.


On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> HTML should allow for an array of ontologies to be used.  Schemaorg is
> needed for search discovery. Others are required for a variety of different
> purposes.
>
> To decentralized, It would be good to change the way the document is
> presented based on the client.
>
> Its of course important to ensure a page is available to search. But I
> don't think it's important to ensure all the ontology (linguistics) is
> embedded in schemaorg.
>
> Tim.h.
>
> On Tue., 4 Oct. 2016, 8:41 pm Jonas Smedegaard, <dr@jones.dk> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Timothy Holborn (2016-10-04 11:19:47)
>> > Had an idea.
>> >
>> > The idea relates to the various ontology mark-up currently placed
>> in-line
>> > with a HTML document.  Problem is various agents want different formats
>> /
>> > different ontologies.
>> >
>> > So,
>> >
>> > HTML5 currently has a
>> >
>> > .HTML
>> > .js
>> > .css
>> >
>> > the suggestion is to add a .bot file (or other name - as that's not
>> > consequential)
>> >
>> > The intention is to improve support for schema by identifying what the
>> > client is, much like the means CSS improves user-experience for 'style'.
>> >
>> > In this way, if the 'agent' is FB - then OG tags; or search providers =
>> > schemaorg, etc.
>> >
>> > The external file would need to be linked to tags in the HTML doc;
>> allowing
>> > it to be flexibly parsed using various schema markup to suit different
>> > agents.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> Problem is, as I see it, that ontologies like schema.org are designed
>> for a specific purpose.
>>
>> Seems backwards to me to support segmentation of communication like
>> that: HTML was invented as a means to _unify_ the needs for exchanging
>> documents, and RDF to do the same for data more generally.  Your idea
>> seems to try go the opposite direction and encourage single-purpose
>> sub-languages of RDF.
>>
>>
>>  - Jonas
>>
>> --
>>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>>
>>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>>
>