- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:44:48 +0200
- To: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <147557428819.4882.14163833947539126197@auryn.jones.dk>
Quoting Timothy Holborn (2016-10-04 11:19:47) > Had an idea. > > The idea relates to the various ontology mark-up currently placed in-line > with a HTML document. Problem is various agents want different formats / > different ontologies. > > So, > > HTML5 currently has a > > .HTML > .js > .css > > the suggestion is to add a .bot file (or other name - as that's not > consequential) > > The intention is to improve support for schema by identifying what the > client is, much like the means CSS improves user-experience for 'style'. > > In this way, if the 'agent' is FB - then OG tags; or search providers = > schemaorg, etc. > > The external file would need to be linked to tags in the HTML doc; allowing > it to be flexibly parsed using various schema markup to suit different > agents. > > Thoughts? Problem is, as I see it, that ontologies like schema.org are designed for a specific purpose. Seems backwards to me to support segmentation of communication like that: HTML was invented as a means to _unify_ the needs for exchanging documents, and RDF to do the same for data more generally. Your idea seems to try go the opposite direction and encourage single-purpose sub-languages of RDF. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 09:40:17 UTC