- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:04:05 -0400
- To: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVo=8HdcWjkW4kURLiuYk440NVXkqE4oecdDgzb-kv_i5w@mail.gmail.com>
You know, IIRC, http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me is frequently thought of as a WebID, so if I could use that and its owl:sameAs relations for access control for rww for all triples regardless of their location, that would be good... -Brent Shambaugh Website: bshambaugh.org On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com > wrote: > or, just making sure I associate bshambaugh.rww.io/profile/card#me > owl:sameAs http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me and have that somehow > associated with everything that is related to me in those two respective > data sources...how do i make sure of that? > > -Brent Shambaugh > > Website: bshambaugh.org > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Brent Shambaugh < > brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Using scipeople:hasAuthored for each individual related triple would it >> seems, but that is painful. Or maybe not, as long as I tell the computer to >> do it :). >> >> -Brent Shambaugh >> >> Website: bshambaugh.org >> >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Brent Shambaugh < >> brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thank you Melvin and Markus. Here are my thoughts. >>> >>> With owl:sameAs I can only link to my name or something very similar in >>> a different datasource. This could be perfectly fine, but my intention >>> might be to link to a collection of triples (say on a LDP server) because I >>> mean to direct the focus there. This might be built on the fly if I know , >>> or am able to infer every other triple that was linked by creating the >>> owl:sameAs link. >>> >>> Maybe more generally I might say bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me >>> scipeople:hasAuthored http://bshambaugh.rww.io/ (great because it >>> could include multiple authors). A problem with this could be that it is >>> not generally recognized as a link in the linked data world. As an example, >>> I was using LodLive the other day, and it was programmaticly constrained to >>> follow only certain links (this makes sense b/c otherwise the graph would >>> be a mess to see). Perhaps rdfs:seeAlso could do, but it does not tell me >>> much semantically beyond a hyperlink IMHO. >>> If I wanted to create two LDP containers and have them be essentially >>> the same, then I could say http://localhost:8080/marmotta/ldpBrentsRWW-1 >>> owl:sameAs http://bshambaugh.rww.io/ . I could then include this in >>> other LDP containers. I might want to however build a set of triples that >>> were associated with me that exist somewhere regardless of where they are >>> stored. Working at the document level of linking LDP containers might not >>> do the trick. Using scipeople:hasAuthored for each individual related >>> triple would it seems, but that is painful. >>> >>> >>> @prefix scipeople: <http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/sci_people.owl> >>> >>> -Brent Shambaugh >>> >>> Website: bshambaugh.org >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Markus Sabadello < >>> markus@projectdanube.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Reminds me of this (several years old) paper by Harry Halpin and others: >>>> https://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws21 >>>> >>>> "When owl:sameAs isn’t the Same: An Analysis of Identity Links on the >>>> Semantic Web" >>>> >>>> It argues that people have been using owl:sameAs for four slightly >>>> different purposes: >>>> - Same Thing As But Referentially Opaque >>>> - Same Thing As But Different Context >>>> - Represents >>>> - Very Similar To >>>> >>>> Markus >>>> >>>> >>>> On 19.03.2016 10:14, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 19 March 2016 at 01:30, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just found it was wicked cool that I could link another linked data >>>>> platform server from another. I was messing around and I inserted >>>>> owl:sameAs. Is there a best practice? Please ignore my other nonsensical >>>>> triples :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, exactly owl : sameAs allows two URIs to be the same. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> curl -iX POST -H "Content-Type: text/turtle" -H "Slug: >>>>> BrentsRWW" --data @/var/www/data/brentrww.ttl >>>>> http://localhost:8080/marmotta/ldp/ >>>>> >>>>> with >>>>> >>>>> HTTP/1.1 201 Created >>>>> Server: Apache Marmotta/3.3.0 (build 0) >>>>> ETag: W/"1458340352000" >>>>> Last-Modified: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:32:32 GMT >>>>> Link: < >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/LDPImplementationReport/2014-09-16>; >>>>> rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#constrainedBy" >>>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type" >>>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#RDFSource>; rel="type" >>>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container>; rel="type" >>>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#BasicContainer>; rel="type" >>>>> Location: http://localhost:8080/marmotta/ldp/BrentsRWW-1 >>>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>>> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:32:32 GMT >>>>> >>>>> cat brentrww.ttl >>>>> >>>>> @prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . >>>>> @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> . >>>>> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . >>>>> >>>>> <> a foaf:PersonalProfileDocument; >>>>> foaf:primaryTopic <#me> ; >>>>> dc:title 'Brent Files' . >>>>> >>>> >>>> Great use of primary topic here! >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> <#me> a foaf:Person; >>>>> foaf:name 'Brent Shambaugh Files' ; >>>>> owl:sameAs <http://bshambaugh.rww.io> . >>>>> >>>> >>>> You'd probably want to link the sameAs to the corresponding #me value >>>> in the second server, rather than the root document. >>>> >>>> It is better to associate data with data, rather than, data with >>>> documents. Documents are the delivery mechanism for data. We should >>>> possibly right an FAQ on this, as it can be a source of confusion sometimes >>>> when starting out with linked data. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Brent Shambaugh >>>>> >>>>> Website: bshambaugh.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> [image: Avast logo] >>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >>>> >>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>>> www.avast.com >>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Saturday, 19 March 2016 15:04:34 UTC