- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:50:49 -0400
- To: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVpN0jsGb1oWbqptk43WujhFd0HD0CJrrB9exqX2jLJEEA@mail.gmail.com>
or, just making sure I associate bshambaugh.rww.io/profile/card#me owl:sameAs http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me and have that somehow associated with everything that is related to me in those two respective data sources...how do i make sure of that? -Brent Shambaugh Website: bshambaugh.org On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com > wrote: > Using scipeople:hasAuthored for each individual related triple would it > seems, but that is painful. Or maybe not, as long as I tell the computer to > do it :). > > -Brent Shambaugh > > Website: bshambaugh.org > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Brent Shambaugh < > brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thank you Melvin and Markus. Here are my thoughts. >> >> With owl:sameAs I can only link to my name or something very similar in a >> different datasource. This could be perfectly fine, but my intention might >> be to link to a collection of triples (say on a LDP server) because I mean >> to direct the focus there. This might be built on the fly if I know , or am >> able to infer every other triple that was linked by creating the owl:sameAs >> link. >> >> Maybe more generally I might say bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me >> scipeople:hasAuthored http://bshambaugh.rww.io/ (great because it could >> include multiple authors). A problem with this could be that it is not >> generally recognized as a link in the linked data world. As an example, I >> was using LodLive the other day, and it was programmaticly constrained to >> follow only certain links (this makes sense b/c otherwise the graph would >> be a mess to see). Perhaps rdfs:seeAlso could do, but it does not tell me >> much semantically beyond a hyperlink IMHO. >> If I wanted to create two LDP containers and have them be essentially the >> same, then I could say http://localhost:8080/marmotta/ldpBrentsRWW-1 >> owl:sameAs http://bshambaugh.rww.io/ . I could then include this in >> other LDP containers. I might want to however build a set of triples that >> were associated with me that exist somewhere regardless of where they are >> stored. Working at the document level of linking LDP containers might not >> do the trick. Using scipeople:hasAuthored for each individual related >> triple would it seems, but that is painful. >> >> >> @prefix scipeople: <http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/sci_people.owl> >> >> -Brent Shambaugh >> >> Website: bshambaugh.org >> >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Markus Sabadello < >> markus@projectdanube.org> wrote: >> >>> Reminds me of this (several years old) paper by Harry Halpin and others: >>> https://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws21 >>> >>> "When owl:sameAs isn’t the Same: An Analysis of Identity Links on the >>> Semantic Web" >>> >>> It argues that people have been using owl:sameAs for four slightly >>> different purposes: >>> - Same Thing As But Referentially Opaque >>> - Same Thing As But Different Context >>> - Represents >>> - Very Similar To >>> >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> On 19.03.2016 10:14, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19 March 2016 at 01:30, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I just found it was wicked cool that I could link another linked data >>>> platform server from another. I was messing around and I inserted >>>> owl:sameAs. Is there a best practice? Please ignore my other nonsensical >>>> triples :) >>>> >>> >>> Yes, exactly owl : sameAs allows two URIs to be the same. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> curl -iX POST -H "Content-Type: text/turtle" -H "Slug: >>>> BrentsRWW" --data @/var/www/data/brentrww.ttl >>>> http://localhost:8080/marmotta/ldp/ >>>> >>>> with >>>> >>>> HTTP/1.1 201 Created >>>> Server: Apache Marmotta/3.3.0 (build 0) >>>> ETag: W/"1458340352000" >>>> Last-Modified: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:32:32 GMT >>>> Link: < >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/LDPImplementationReport/2014-09-16>; >>>> rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#constrainedBy" >>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource>; rel="type" >>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#RDFSource>; rel="type" >>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Container>; rel="type" >>>> Link: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#BasicContainer>; rel="type" >>>> Location: http://localhost:8080/marmotta/ldp/BrentsRWW-1 >>>> Content-Length: 0 >>>> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 22:32:32 GMT >>>> >>>> cat brentrww.ttl >>>> >>>> @prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . >>>> @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> . >>>> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . >>>> >>>> <> a foaf:PersonalProfileDocument; >>>> foaf:primaryTopic <#me> ; >>>> dc:title 'Brent Files' . >>>> >>> >>> Great use of primary topic here! >>> >>> >>>> >>>> <#me> a foaf:Person; >>>> foaf:name 'Brent Shambaugh Files' ; >>>> owl:sameAs <http://bshambaugh.rww.io> . >>>> >>> >>> You'd probably want to link the sameAs to the corresponding #me value in >>> the second server, rather than the root document. >>> >>> It is better to associate data with data, rather than, data with >>> documents. Documents are the delivery mechanism for data. We should >>> possibly right an FAQ on this, as it can be a source of confusion sometimes >>> when starting out with linked data. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Brent Shambaugh >>>> >>>> Website: bshambaugh.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> [image: Avast logo] >>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >>> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >>> www.avast.com >>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Saturday, 19 March 2016 14:51:17 UTC