Was there not a principle, stated or unstated, in RDF or linked data specification, that there would be different representations of triples, *and* that they would *be* equal? seth the #toothlessfoodie <https://plus.google.com/s/%23toothlessfoodie> Facebook: facebook.com/russell.seth Blog: fastblogit.com/seth/ Talking products: www.speaktomecatalog.com On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > All, > > Is there any reason why Turtle and JSON-LD cannot be on equal footing in > regards to the WebID spec? > > There's no reason why WebID-Profile documents MUST be comprised of RDF > content in Turtle Notation. > > Its crystal clear that we have two critical developer communities that > coalesce around Turtle and JSON-LD i.e., Semantic Web and Web Developers, > respectively. Thus, its in the best interest of adoption for the WebID spec > to treat Turtle and JSON-LD as different RDF notations for creating RDF > document content e.g., WebID-Profile documents. > > WebID-TLS implementers should be encouraged to support WebID-Profile > documents comprised of Turtle or JSON-LD content. This is really important, > at this point in time. > > -- > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com > Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 14:41:12 UTC