W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Turtle and JSON-LD Matter

From: Seth Russell <russell.seth@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 07:40:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CACfYUR7EwyP6fAbZW43hudWCzBtC7UNsqPLSdnLJxHv4SDiM8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Was there not a principle, stated or unstated, in RDF or linked data
specification, that there would be different representations of triples,
*and* that they would *be* equal?


the #toothlessfoodie <https://plus.google.com/s/%23toothlessfoodie>
Facebook: facebook.com/russell.seth
Blog: fastblogit.com/seth/
Talking products: www.speaktomecatalog.com

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>

> All,
> Is there any reason why Turtle and JSON-LD cannot be on equal footing in
> regards to the WebID spec?
> There's no reason why WebID-Profile documents MUST be comprised of RDF
> content in Turtle Notation.
> Its crystal clear that we have two critical developer communities that
> coalesce around Turtle and JSON-LD  i.e., Semantic Web and Web Developers,
> respectively. Thus, its in the best interest of adoption for the WebID spec
> to treat Turtle and JSON-LD as different RDF notations for creating RDF
> document content e.g., WebID-Profile documents.
> WebID-TLS implementers should be encouraged to support WebID-Profile
> documents comprised of Turtle or JSON-LD content. This is really important,
> at this point in time.
> --
> Regards,
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
> Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 14:41:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:10:47 UTC