Re: Turtle and JSON-LD Matter

On 16 July 2014 16:19, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Is there any reason why Turtle and JSON-LD cannot be on equal footing in
> regards to the WebID spec?
>
> There's no reason why WebID-Profile documents MUST be comprised of RDF
> content in Turtle Notation.
>
> Its crystal clear that we have two critical developer communities that
> coalesce around Turtle and JSON-LD  i.e., Semantic Web and Web Developers,
> respectively. Thus, its in the best interest of adoption for the WebID spec
> to treat Turtle and JSON-LD as different RDF notations for creating RDF
> document content e.g., WebID-Profile documents.
>

Not an issue for me to add JSON LD to my WebID, if needed.  It only took me
30 minutes to add turtle support :)

Would be interesting to see what others think.


>
> WebID-TLS implementers should be encouraged to support WebID-Profile
> documents comprised of Turtle or JSON-LD content. This is really important,
> at this point in time.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
> Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
>
>
>