- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 14:20:15 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5187F45F.1040005@openlinksw.com>
On 5/6/13 1:53 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 04/22/2013 09:42 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 4/21/13 10:30 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: >>>>> Keys *can* have URLs as per the cert ontology. They can be blank >>>>> nodes too, which I think is currently more common. I use a URL. >>> It's Linked Data, you *can* do anything. The question here is MUST. In >>> Web Keys, keys MUST have a URL. That requirement makes it so that you >>> can depend on that URL when verifying digital signatures. >> Do you have an example of a 5-star Linked Data URI that denotes a public >> key? > curl "https://dev.payswarm.com/i/manu/keys/4" > > -- manu > > See: 1. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com:8000/vapour?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fdev.payswarm.com%2Fi%2Fmanu%2Fkeys%2F4&defaultResponse=dontmind&userAgent=vapour.sourceforge.net -- yours 2. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com:8000/vapour?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fid.myopenlink.net%2Fcertgen%2Fkey%2F497&validateRDF=1&defaultResponse=dontmind&userAgent=vapour.sourceforge.net -- one of mine Both URIs are supposed to denote public keys. Links: 1. http://bit.ly/P0HVdI -- post about benefits of denoting Public Keys using Linked Data URIs. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 18:20:41 UTC