W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Fwd: LDP 1.0 editor drafts ready for Last Call

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:59:12 -0400
Message-ID: <51F13D40.8080001@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rww@w3.org
On 7/25/13 10:29 AM, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC wrote:
>
> If someone is interested in a node.js implementation of LDP, node_ldp is your
> friend: https://github.com/AKSW/node_ldp
> (sorry jürgen for capturing the thread :-)

Time to make a Turtle document that describes the existing LDP 
implementations :-)

Kingsley
>
> Best regards
>
> Sebastian Tramp
>
>> hi,
>>
>> just wrote the following to the ldp mailing list (not the ldp-wg one)
>> (maybe i find someone here to join the project)
>>
>>
>> i just started with another implementation of the LDP recom.
>> it is based on the servlet API and will be realized as a simple
>> serlvet that needs to extended (analog to HttpServlet) to fit whatever
>> datasource.
>> the main logic will go into a GenericLDPServlet. Extensions of this
>> servlet will need to implement something like a dereference or a sparql
>> method.
>>
>> the main motivation behind this approach is to create a ldp impl that
>> a broad audience is able to install on an existing environment (tomcat,
>> jboss, websphere, any compliant servlet container) and to make the logic
>> behind ldp (post, get, put, delete,...) datasource independent. it will
>> only be necessary to implement methods like dereference or sparql
>> specific to a certain datasource (i'll start with a reference impl based
>> on openrdf's sesame).
>>
>> i put online the source of the ultra alpha sandbox online at github [1].
>> take a look a GenericLDPServlet [2] to get an idea where i want to go.
>>
>> i'd really appreciate any comments on this approach and would be happy
>> if someone would like to join.
>>
>> wkr jürgen
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/turnguard/com-turnguard-ldp
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/turnguard/com-turnguard-ldp/blob/master/com-turnguard-ldp-utils/com-turnguard-ldp-utils-servlet/src/main/java/com/turnguard/ldp/utils/servlet/base/GenericLDPServlet.java
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 21:05 +0200, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>> FYI:  Linked data platform is going to last call.  It's a way to
>>> remotely store and change data using the common HTTP verbs of GET PUT
>>> DELETE.  And also it allows for 'containers' of resources, which
>>> operate in a similar way to directories in a file system.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 24 July 2013 20:10
>>> Subject: LDP 1.0 editor drafts ready for Last Call
>>> To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe I have covered all outstanding editor tasks that we agreed
>>> upon prior to going to "Last Call" [1].  The draft is available [2]
>>> and will have the change history removed prior to publication.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will go forward now with requesting publication.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] - http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-07-22#resolution_2
>>> [2] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html
>>>
>>> I should also note that the vocabulary document [3] is current with
>>> the draft.
>>> [3] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.ttl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Steve Speicher
>>>
>>>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen






Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 14:59:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:10:42 UTC