- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:47:21 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50649F39.1060706@openlinksw.com>
On 9/27/12 1:48 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > Fragments are probably the most misunderstood concept on the web, but > very important to the RWW. Great that the W3C has put together some > guidance. > > My own personal take on this is that the Web started out as a Web of > Documents, but the intention was always to be a web of data. > 'Everything connected to everything' as expressed in Weaving the Web. > > It took me many years to appreciate what a neat idea the Web of > Documents was. Perfectly natural as human civilization has been > strongly influenced by documents for 5000 years. Then I ask myself > the question: "Is it a reasonable thing to split documents up into > sections?". I came to the conclusion, absolutely yes. It's also what > humans have done for 1000s of years. This is the secret weapon of the > web and allows parts of documents to be annotated as data. And the # > character is at the center of it all. > > I think a good understanding of the # character is essential to seeing > the FULL vision of the WWW and RWW. Read more below! > > http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2012/09/27/media-fragments-uri-1-0-basic-is-a-w3c-recommendation/ I would add, good understanding of hyperlinks as *denotation* mechanisms is vital to understanding the Web. To TimBL's credit, he consistently refers to URIs as Names, he doesn't ever slip on that [1] :-) Links: 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OM6XIICm_qo#t=69s -- specific mention of URLs as names as critical part of the system . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 18:47:50 UTC