Re: Folding the Trust CG into RWW CG

On 9/25/12 1:55 PM, Nathan wrote:
> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>> Excerpts from Melvin Carvalho's message of 2012-09-25 15:09:49 +0000:
>>> I've spoken to Dominik Tomaszuk about the possibility of folding 
>>> work on
>>> trust from unctsw (Uncertainty and Trust in the Semantic Web) into the
>>> read-write web group.
>>>
>>> The reason is that the CG has fallen inactive (no chair, no posts in 
>>> the
>>> last 6 months).  In fact the only 2 messages on the mailing list to 
>>> date
>>> have been Coralie asking for a chair to be picked and the wiki is 
>>> empty.
>>>
>>> So far I've had two +1s (dominik and rszeno) for folding unctsw into 
>>> RWW.
>>> I do also think that trust will become an important topic for the 
>>> RWW as
>>> things mature, so a +1 also from me.
>>>
>>> Given that the other CG is inactive, I suspect conversation will be 
>>> light,
>>> and if things pick up significantly we can always split conversation 
>>> out
>>> into its own group.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there's any objections to this, happy to consider
>>> alternatives.
>> +1
>>
>> I would like to see added reference to *Trust* in RWW group 
>> description :)
>
> RWWoT ?
>
>
Nice.

What about: WWoRT (World Wide Web of Readable Trust) . Then for Melvin, 
the triangulation to Worth and Wealth gets one step easier :-)

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen