- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:04:15 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5048913F.9090502@openlinksw.com>
On 9/5/12 12:08 PM, Luca Costabello wrote: > Kingsley, just a side note: in Shi3ld, we deliberately chose not to > rely on access control lists. Instead, we adopt an attribute-based > authorization mechanism. This allows us to offer more expressive > access control policies, such as location-based or time based > policies. As a side note, we also use SPARQL ASKS to verify access > conditions. My point is that are doing something similar but in a manner that works with any ACL ontology. SPARQL ASK is the last resort, and even then, it uses patterns based on terms from the ACL ontology. As per usual, I am proposing loose coupling of these things. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 12:04:44 UTC