- From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 20:26:03 +0200
- To: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
- CC: Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
On 02.09.2012 16:46, bergi wrote: > The Skype call starts in 15 minutes. Contact me on Skype if you would > like to join. > > Skype-Name: bergos123 Summary of the meeting: 1. I create class diagram of current UAC version [1] 2. We think about: 2.1. modify ontology to be more close to RBAC_1 or RBAC_2 model [2]. I think that it will be good to base our ontology on mathematically proven models. [bergi, domel] 2.2. add possible to define default policy (add DefaultPolicy class, Deny and Allow subclasses) - I will prepare some examples to next meeting [domel] 3. We agreed to change: 3.1. add temporal values (using OWL-Time [3]), i.e. to define time when rules are valid [domel] 3.2. add a superclass (abstract class) called operation or action to group (sub)class Read and Write. So that extand the ontology to other operations. [domel] 3.3. add some OWL vocabluary to clarify dependence i.e. class constructions, property constructions, constraints etc (equivalentClass to WAC [4] and many many more) [domel] 3.4. differentiate property names and class names. Now there are many properties and classes, which have the same names. I want change it by adding prefixes, i.e. filter -> hasFilter [bergi] 4. We're not quite agree on whether or not to add new operations. I propose add two Updare and Remove classes. Then it can be mapped to REST operations: GET - Read, POST - Write, PUT - Update, DELETE - Remove. Bergi is able to agree to these operations. [domel] * In square bracket there is nick who prepare that point to next teleconf. [1] http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg255/scaled.php?server=255&filename=uacu.png&res=landing [2] http://csrc.nist.gov/rbac/sandhu96.pdf [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/time# [4] http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl Cheers, Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2012 18:26:31 UTC