Re: Adding an app to a profile

On 28 November 2012 20:33, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 11/28/12 1:22 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of 2012-11-28 18:13:19 +0000:
>>
>>> On 11/28/12 12:36 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 November 2012 18:32, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org
>>>> <mailto:nathan@webr3.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          Part of the RWW is a clean separation between apps, data and
>>>>          identiry.
>>>>
>>>>          I was wondering if there's a convenient single predicate to
>>>>          add a webapp to
>>>>          a profile page.
>>>>
>>>>          Currently I use foaf : interest which isnt really accurate.
>>>>
>>>>          We were thinking about creating
>>>>
>>>>          plink : webapp
>>>>
>>>>          As per http://ontologi.es/
>>>>
>>>>          Any thoughts on this?
>>>>
>>>>          I think it would be awesome when we can finally start adding
>>>>          apps to our
>>>>          pages.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Somehow I don't follow lol, why would we link from our foaf to an
>>>>      app? and in what capacity?
>>>>
>>>>      - saying "I created/contribute to this app"
>>>>      - saying "this is my account on website/app x" (eg this is my
>>>> twitter)
>>>>      - something else?
>>>>
>>>>      (generally I'd thought we'd link to our data, and then different
>>>>      apps of a users preference would consume/display that data)
>>>>
>>>>      Apologies for the confusing, I think I'm just missing a little
>>>>      context somwhere :D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's similar to when you add an app to facebook or google plus.  Then
>>>> you get a link in your sidebar of your profile to say, your calendar,
>>>> tasks, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Also then other people can see what apps you use
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Nath
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Yes, so you have "use" as the verb in the sentence: I use X . Thus, you
>>> can just start with a Turtle file that states:
>>>
>>> # start
>>>
>>> <#i> <#use> <SomeApp>.
>>>
>>> #if you find a preferred predicate from a shared vocabulary or ontology,
>>> you can just add:
>>> <#use> rdfs:subPropertyOf <NewlyDiscoveredPredictateURI> .
>>>
>>> # OR
>>>
>>> <#use> owl:equivalentProperty <NewlyDiscoveredPredictateURI> .
>>>
>>> # end
>>>
>>> It just depends on what you are trying to say, don't be distracted by
>>> the search for a perfect predicate from a shared vocabulary etc..
>>>
>> thanks for this tip!
>>
>> how does it work later on when i start writing queries?
>>
>>
>>
>>  Depends on your DBMS or Data Store. If using Virtuoso the FROM CLAUSE
> will invoke an HTTP GET, the kind that also leverages HTTP's in-built cache
> invalidation functionality.
>
> select distinct * from <RDFDocumentURL> where {?s ?p ?o}
>
> or
>
> describe ?s from <RDFDocumentURL> where {?s ?p ?o}
>
> etc..
>
> And if for whatever reasons you don't get anything or what you get is
> stale, just add the following pragma before the query:
>
> define get:soft "replace"
>
> This forces an HTTP GET and ignores cache invalidation modality of the
> instance.


so how about plink : uses ?

but then again I could say I use public transport, but that doesnt indicate
that it is a webapp ...


>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehen<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen>
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/about<https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about>
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehen<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen>
>
>
>
>
>
>