- From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:01:31 +0100
- To: public-rww@w3.org
On 02.11.2012 02:18, Andrei Sambra wrote: > On 11/01/2012 11:00 PM, Nathan wrote: >> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> On 11/1/12 2:07 PM, Joe Presbrey wrote: >>>> Here's a sample rule from the wiki: >>>> >>>> [acl:accessTo <card.rdf>; acl:mode acl:Read, acl:agentClass >>>> foaf:Agent]. >>>> >>>> Quick question with regard to acl:accessTo <card.rdf>: >>>> >>>> Many LD servers I see also serve the same graph at <card.ttl>, >>>> <card.json>, <card?format=json>, and/or <card> (w/ Accept: */format). >>>> >>>> We can't expect users to enumerate all these in their rules. Does >>>> anyone have an example implementation of one of these kinds of >>>> servers? >>>> >>>> Should we drop the type suffix (.rdf) from the wiki examples? eg. the >>>> rule should be simply acl:accessTo <card>, and apply to all content >>>> negotiations for the same graph. >>> >>> +1 >> >> Likewise +1. >> >> Also, which link relation are we using to expose where the acl is (so it >> can also be edited over rww? >> > > +1 as well. Same as above +1 Dominik
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:02:31 UTC