- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:18:55 +0100
- To: public-rww@w3.org
On 11/01/2012 11:00 PM, Nathan wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 11/1/12 2:07 PM, Joe Presbrey wrote: >>> Here's a sample rule from the wiki: >>> >>> [acl:accessTo <card.rdf>; acl:mode acl:Read, acl:agentClass foaf:Agent]. >>> >>> Quick question with regard to acl:accessTo <card.rdf>: >>> >>> Many LD servers I see also serve the same graph at <card.ttl>, >>> <card.json>, <card?format=json>, and/or <card> (w/ Accept: */format). >>> >>> We can't expect users to enumerate all these in their rules. Does >>> anyone have an example implementation of one of these kinds of >>> servers? >>> >>> Should we drop the type suffix (.rdf) from the wiki examples? eg. the >>> rule should be simply acl:accessTo <card>, and apply to all content >>> negotiations for the same graph. >> >> +1 > > Likewise +1. > > Also, which link relation are we using to expose where the acl is (so it > can also be edited over rww? > +1 as well. Andrei
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 01:19:23 UTC