- From: Dominique Guardiola <dguardiola@quinode.fr>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:23:47 +0200
- To: public-rww@w3.org
Le 20 juil. 2012 à 14:30, nil a écrit : > There now seem to be two > classes (sioc:MailMessage, nmo:Message) that both have the same > purpose. Is there a way to "combine" them, so that software > understanding one, but not the other can take the information it > understands and ignore the rest? Hi Niklas If your class mix brings no contradiction between ontologies, you can do that just by giving the two rdf:type to your resources. Here you have : - nmo:Message, a subclass of rdfs:Resource - sioc:Post, a sioc:Item which is a foaf:Document, which is an owl:Class, which is itself a subclass of rdfs:Class As rdfs:Class is also a rdfs:Resource... I suppose you can go and add the two types to your resources. Correct me anyone here if I'm wrong here, I'm no rdfs/owl expert at all ! -- Dominique Guardiola, QUINODE • http://www.quinode.fr/ • Tel : 04.27.86.84.37 • Mob : 06.15.13.22.27
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 13:24:19 UTC