- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:00:42 +0100
- To: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Cc: public-rww@w3.org
On 16 January 2012 23:13, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> wrote: > Hi! > > Over at the unhosted community group (very much related to this one, as you > probably know), we're thinking about using the abbreviation 'rww' to refer > to content relative to its author, instead of relative to its server. Since > this is the rww community group, i thought i would give you a heads-up. > Here's the thread: > > http://groups.google.com/group/unhosted/browse_thread/thread/646a959ee299460a > > Let me know how people would feel about that, and especially if you think > 'rww' means something else than that. I just noticed this too http://code.google.com/p/google-sgnodemapper/ creating uri schemes are a lot of work to get through IANA/IETF ... generally it's only used as a very last resort if you cant find a way to solve your problem > > > Cheers! > Michiel
Received on Sunday, 22 January 2012 13:01:09 UTC