W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > January 2012

Re: using the abbreviation 'rww'

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:00:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLt+6+SRYcXA06rjhrk9SkWT7Z8-DG88-FaZmnGnCB71w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
Cc: public-rww@w3.org
On 16 January 2012 23:13, Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Over at the unhosted community group (very much related to this one, as you
> probably know), we're thinking about using the abbreviation 'rww' to refer
> to content relative to its author, instead of relative to its server. Since
> this is the rww community group, i thought i would give you a heads-up.
> Here's the thread:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/unhosted/browse_thread/thread/646a959ee299460a
>
> Let me know how people would feel about that, and especially if you think
> 'rww' means something else than that.

I just noticed this too

http://code.google.com/p/google-sgnodemapper/

creating uri schemes are a lot of work to get through IANA/IETF ...
generally it's only used as a very last resort if you cant find a way
to solve your problem


>
>
> Cheers!
> Michiel
Received on Sunday, 22 January 2012 13:01:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:10:23 UTC