- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:03:23 +0100
- To: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJhYtpvzz8Y-bA=8CGL6zQvrKS2vUKNPPZYXgysih-sbw@mail.gmail.com>
On 29 November 2012 15:19, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > So it seems that in the end we still need a vocabulary to convey that we > the user of a certain application. With the risk of hijacking this thread, > I would like to suggest that we also look for a way of describing what an > app is capable of. > > For example: > * does it allow users to create a WebID account > * does it support WebID authn > * does it allow users to send messages > * does it offer a public/private Wall > * etc. > This is now working! https://my-profile.eu/view.php?webid=http%3A%2F%2Fmelvincarvalho.com%2F%23me using the socweb : webapp predicate it's now possible to browse the apps that people are using, and add them to your own profile! I currently have three apps that I use, but hopefully more to come next year. Great, work Andrei, and looking forward to even better granularity when we start with workspaces ... > > Andrei > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:09 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > >> Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of 2012-11-29 12:55:20 +0000: >> > On 11/28/12 7:22 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> > > >> > > so how about plink : uses ? >> > > >> > > but then again I could say I use public transport, but that doesnt >> > > indicate that it is a webapp ... >> > >> > So in your profile document you can state: >> > >> > >> > <#i> <#use> <SomeApp>. >> > <SomeApp> a <#application> . >> > <#application> owl:equivalentClass <SomeSharedOntologyClass> . >> > >> > # or >> > >> > <#application> rdfs:subClassOf <SomeSharedOntologyClass> . >> > >> > etc.. >> > >> > Just do what you would do in the real world with natural language. >> > Describe the world as you see it and then expand to the broader world >> > via connections. >> >> do you have recommendations of where to discuss choosing some common >> vocabularies for modeling certain domains? >> >> this website looks like a great reference but i don't find any space for >> open community interaction there :( >> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ (editors in cc) >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2012 21:03:50 UTC