- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:54:46 +0200
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Cc: Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
On 9 Apr 2012, at 15:12, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > Hi Henry, > > On 04/08/2012 06:20 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As I understand POSTing a resource to a Collection should create a new resource. >> We want to allow collections to be POST only so that unknown people can post into >> a collection without seeing the other resource in it. (whilst perhaps allowing the >> POSTer to edit the resources he created in that collection). We would like the owner >> of the collection to be able to know what is in the collection: so that he can for >> example find the new resources POSTed there. >> >> So some user should be able to >> >> POST /collection/ HTTP/1.1 >> >> thereby having the read-write-web server create the resource >> >> /collection/r42 >> >> which he could later edit in case he made a mistake. But he would not be >> albe to find the elements of the collection by doing a >> >> GET /collection/ > > There is no perfect solution for handling collections. I kind of like > Sandro's idea [1]. Also, this is a place where using the WebDav verbs > (eg. MKCOL) should be considered IMO. But this could be a problem in > the browser. Thanks. I added file creation to a collection with the last patch https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/read-write-web/rev/5cf67ba5c0d4 in particular https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/read-write-web/file/5cf67ba5c0d4/src/main/scala/ReadWriteWeb.scala#l115 I'll try to do directory listings next, and also read up more closely on the other comments on the list.... > Alexandre. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/REST#Creating_Collections > >> >> as that would be protected. He certainly could not edit what ends up being the >> equivalent of /collection/index{.rdf} since he does not have access to that >> file. It must therefore be up to the ReadWriteWeb server to do three things: >> >> 1. create a name for the POSTed resource >> 2. update/display the collection (sioc:Collection?) index retrieved when >> doing a GET /collection/ >> 3. Only show a subset of those elements of the collection that an agent >> has read access to >> >> I think the scala read-write-web does not have POST on a collection (a directory >> in unix terminology) create a new file currently. (It has a POST of a SPARQL update >> on an rdf information resource change it.) >> >> Does that sound right? >> >> Henry >> >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 13:56:05 UTC