- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:47:46 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F7C8942.2000903@openlinksw.com>
On 4/4/12 1:04 PM, Henry Story wrote: > Currently if I PUT a file with an extension such as .rdf or .ttl > on a read-write-web server, should the server pay particular attention > to those extensions? Or should it be agnostic about them? Shouldn't pay any attention to them . Tell the server what you are PUTing via HTTP request header :-) > > I suppose I am asking how close an rdf read-write-web server is to a > web-dav server? The are the same thing modulo methods that WebDAV adds to basic HTTP. > > If I PUT foaf.ttl > should a GET foaf.rdf then succeed? You can PUT a ttl resource and have a server send you back an rdf/xml document, for instance. > what about a GET foaf HTTP/1.1 ? No need for that :-) Kingsley > > Henry > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 17:48:09 UTC