W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PUT and extensions

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:47:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4F7C8942.2000903@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rww@w3.org
On 4/4/12 1:04 PM, Henry Story wrote:
> Currently if I PUT a file with an extension such as .rdf or .ttl
> on a read-write-web server, should the server pay particular attention
> to those extensions? Or should it be agnostic about them?

Shouldn't pay any attention to them . Tell the server what you are 
PUTing via HTTP request header :-)
>
> I suppose I am asking how close an rdf read-write-web server is to a
> web-dav server?

The are the same thing modulo methods that WebDAV adds to basic HTTP.

>
> If I PUT foaf.ttl
> should a GET foaf.rdf then succeed?

You can PUT a ttl resource and have a server send you back an rdf/xml 
document, for instance.
> what about a GET foaf HTTP/1.1 ?

No need for that :-)

Kingsley
>
> Henry
>
> 	
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 17:48:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:10:25 UTC