AW: Time Vocabulary

Yes it'd be good. Please note, that I did not ignore your proposal of extending DUL. I was just looking at PROV-O first and it seemd to be well providing what we aim for (at least partly). I don't know if it's doable to do both, that is, a) 'extending from DUL' and b) 'extending from PROV-O' in one vocab.

What do you think?

best,
Peter

________________________________
Von: Monika Solanki [monika.solanki@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Juni 2015 12:25
An: Daniele Dell'Aglio; public-rsp@w3.org
Betreff: Re: Time Vocabulary

Hi,

Indeed, only that it cannot happen today because of a deliverable deadline. I will be joining the call though, so I can certainly participate in the discussion.

Monika

On 26/06/2015 11:20, Daniele Dell'Aglio wrote:
Hi,
Peter, thank you for the effort. Monika, could you try to propose an extension (or alternative) version from DUL? It would help the comparison and the discussion.

Daniele

Il giorno ven 26 giu 2015 alle ore 11:08 Monika Solanki <monika.solanki@gmail.com<mailto:monika.solanki@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
I still think extending from a foundational ontology such as DUL has its purpose and advantages, so besides PROV-O it would also be useful to extend from DUL. However, I will leave it at that.


Monika



On 26/06/2015 10:44, Wetz Peter wrote:
Dear all,

as discussed extensively on the list (cf. [1]) there is a need to create a small time vocabulary (or reuse existing terms) for capturing relations between streamed graphs and time instants.

I have done a first simple proposal and uploaded it to the repo at [2]. I reuse properties of PROV-O by specializing from some PROV-O terms. I hope you can take a look so we can have a discussion in today’s telco.

Looking forward!

Best,
Peter

[1] https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/issues/10
[2] https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/blob/master/TimeVocab.owl