Re: Time Vocabulary

Hi,

Indeed, only that it cannot happen today because of a deliverable 
deadline. I will be joining the call though, so I can certainly 
participate in the discussion.

Monika

On 26/06/2015 11:20, Daniele Dell'Aglio wrote:
> Hi,
> Peter, thank you for the effort. Monika, could you try to propose an 
> extension (or alternative) version from DUL? It would help the 
> comparison and the discussion.
>
> Daniele
>
> Il giorno ven 26 giu 2015 alle ore 11:08 Monika Solanki 
> <monika.solanki@gmail.com <mailto:monika.solanki@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
>
>     I still think extending from a foundational ontology such as DUL
>     has its purpose and advantages, so besides PROV-O it would also be
>     useful to extend from DUL. However, I will leave it at that.
>
>
>     Monika
>
>
>
>     On 26/06/2015 10:44, Wetz Peter wrote:
>>
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     as discussed extensively on the list (cf. [1]) there is a need to
>>     create a small time vocabulary (or reuse existing terms) for
>>     capturing relations between streamed graphs and time instants.
>>
>>     I have done a first simple proposal and uploaded it to the repo
>>     at [2]. I reuse properties of PROV-O by specializing from some
>>     PROV-O terms. I hope you can take a look so we can have a
>>     discussion in today’s telco.
>>
>>     Looking forward!
>>
>>     Best,
>>
>>     Peter
>>
>>     [1] https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/issues/10
>>
>>     [2]
>>     https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/blob/master/TimeVocab.owl
>>
>