- From: Emanuele Della Valle <emanuele.dellavalle@polimi.it>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:34:50 +0000
- To: "public-rsp@w3.org" <public-rsp@w3.org>
- CC: Emanuele Della Valle <emanuele.dellavalle@polimi.it>
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 15:36:42 UTC
Dear all, please find (attached) and on the wiki [1] the version of the query we agreed upon during the 12.12.2014 call [2]. I left the aggregate clause in, but I agree we should start with a profile (RSP-QL core) that sticks to the shrinking semantics of SPARQL 1.1 aggregates. The kind of non-shrinking aggregates I propose can go in another profile of the RSP-QL language. Best regards, Emanuele [1] https://www.w3.org/community/rsp/wiki/Example_of_RSP-QL_query [2] https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/commit/142f60c4345401dffba3eac0b6667e383a4a3139 -- prof. Emanuele Della Valle DEIB - Politecnico di Milano w. http://emanueledellavalle.org
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 15:36:42 UTC