- From: Oscar Corcho <ocorcho@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:07:34 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>, "public-rsp@w3.org" <public-rsp@w3.org>
Axel, I agree with your points. In fact the first couple of calls I was scribing and used a pseudo-zakim note-taking mode. Today I was also planning to scribe, but some software that I installed yesterday was interfering with Webex and could only follow the chat. Hopefully, that's solved for the next one and I can do the scribing again. Oscar -- Oscar Corcho Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05 Fax (+34) 91 352 48 19 El 22/11/13 16:11, "Axel Polleres" <axel@polleres.net> escribió: >Dear all, > >while I learnt today that we can't use W3C's infrastructure for our >phone calls, I'd still suggest to base on their best practices for making >it easier to follow the phone calls: > >1) have an assigned scribe per Telco (disjoint from the chair, who should >moderate and keep the speaker queue), > >2) assign scribelist before meetings, to be sure that scribe knows >beforehand and is preparded to scribe > >3) have a speaker queue (miantained by the chair) > >4) use W3C notetaking style in the chatŠ e.g. for assigning actions, >noting who said what, etc. > >5) ...use a (W3C) IRC chat channel, I think IRC is more convenient than >the Webex chat. Maybe - to be checked with W3C team - we could et least >use their note-generation tools, even if we are not allowed to use all >their bot and Telco facilities like Zakim) > >6) the W3C members among us (WU will join in Jan) could maybe try to >lobby for community groups to be allowed to use some of the facilities >that don't cause them team resources > >best, >Axel >
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 17:08:13 UTC