Re: Possible additional CTAUR edit

Thank you, Scott, for your review.
On 3/3/24 08:14, Scott Hollier wrote:
>
> To Jason  and Janina
>
> Agree with the removal of the info in the introduction and personally 
> I think Section 9 covers it but no issue if edits are made.
>
> Also great to see the merge of changes into the main branch – looking 
> fantastic, great work Janina and Jason.
>
> Scott.
>
> Dr Scott Hollier
> CEO & Co-founder
>
> Centre for Accessibility Australia logo 
> <https://www.accessibility.org.au/>
>
> Centre For Accessibility Australia Ltd.
> Phone: +61 (0)430 351 909
> Email: scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au 
> <mailto:scott.hollier@accessibility.org.au>
> Address: Suite 5, Belmont Hub, 213 Wright Street, Cloverdale WA 6105
>
> accessibility.org.au <https://www.accessibility.org.au/>
>
> *Subscribe to our newsletter* <http://eepurl.com/drA-ib>
>
> Instagram icon 
> <https://www.instagram.com/centreforaccessibility/>Facebook icon 
> <https://www.facebook.com/centreforaccessibility>Twitter icon 
> <https://twitter.com/centrefora11y>LinkedIn icon 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/centreforaccessibility/>
>
> /CFA Australia respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners of 
> Country across Australia and pay our respects to Elders past, present 
> and emerging /
>
> *From:*Jason J.G. White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 2, 2024 10:41 PM
> *To:* Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
> *Cc:* public-rqtf@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: Possible additional CTAUR edit
>
> On 2/3/24 08:56, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
>     I'm thinking our preference for controls that reflect standard
>
>     expectations over arbitrarily mapped keyboard shortcuts is an important
>
>     requirement. I propose we migrate it out of the Introduction and into
>
>     our requirements, though I'm not sure yet exactly where I think it
>
>     should go.
>
> We created section 9 and included this requirement there, but we 
> didn't remove it from the introduction. I propose removing it from the 
> introduction.
>
> Janina, are you satisfied with the way it's stated in section 9, or 
> should we revise that further?
>
> I'll fix the introduction.
>