- From: Jason J.G. White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:25:01 -0500
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: public-rqtf@w3.org
Thank you, Janina, for documenting that plan. On 28/2/24 09:21, Janina Sajka wrote: > Dear Jason, All: > > I have pushed an edit addressing your point re the Abstract just in the > past hour. Please advise whether it satisfies. > > Also, I agree regarding Sec. 1.2, but that edit is likely to need a > couple days. > > Best, > Janina > > Jason White writes: >> On 26/2/24 19:53, Janina Sajka wrote: >>> Note that I may make additional edits ahead of our meeting, so feel free >>> to suggest edits in reply to this message ahead of our call. >> Thank you, Janina. Based on an initial reading, I would make the following >> suggestions. >> >> 1. In the abstract, "examples of the former" is ambiguous due to recent >> editing - perhaps change it to be more specific about the type of tool. >> >> 2. The later paragraphs of section 1.2 would, I think, benefit from >> clarification and streamlining. If you could give them a review and decide >> whether you agree, and whether there are changes you wish to make. >> >> 3. In general, the revisions are progressing well, and in accord with Task >> Force discussions.
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2024 14:25:06 UTC