- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:54:12 -0400
- To: "Jason J.G. White" <jason@jasonjgw.net>
- Cc: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Jason White writes: > > On 24/4/24 14:19, Janina Sajka wrote: > > Nevertheless, there are situations where content isn't amenable to > > textual summarization. I think we may need to account for that a bit in > > 14a and b. ... > > I suppose a graphical or even an auditory summary would be possible in > principle. Nowhere does the current draft state that the summary must be > textual. It's left open. > > We could restrict 14A to textual content, if desired, including code as well > as natural language text. My inclination, though, would be to leave the > space open to non-textual summaries. Ah, I hadn't thought of nontextual summarization. You've convinced me. Let's leave it ambiguous! Janina -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa Linux Foundation Fellow https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2024 11:54:19 UTC