- From: Joshue O'Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 11:08:07 +0100
- To: Scott Hollier <scott@hollier.info>
- Cc: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4fc67d77-5655-ff6e-8a09-91a8e1316548@w3.org>
> Scott Hollier <mailto:scott@hollier.info> > Wednesday 5 May 2021 01:31 > To Joshn > > +1 from me - makes the guidance more universal too. Great Scott - (couldn't resist that *grin) That change is now in main, thanks. Josh > > Scott. > > > Dr Scott Hollier > Digital Access Specialist > Mobile: +61 (0)430 351 909 > Web: www.hollier.info > > Technology for everyone > > Keep up with digital access news by following @scotthollier on Twitter. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshue O'Connor <joconnor@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2021 7:33 PM > To: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org> > Subject: Clarifying the note on VRS and VRI in RAUR > > Hi all, > > We have had a comment from Gunnar about simplifying the note relating > to VRS/VRI in RAUR. He is suggesting that we change the title of the > issue to 'Text and Video relay services', and rather than mentioning > the situation in the UK/US - the Note simply says - " To successfully > connect video or text relay services should not require a complicated > sequence of user actions." [1] [2] > > I like this, as I think the heading change is simpler and same for the > note. Any objections or concerns to either proposal? > > Thanks > > Josh > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/177#issuecomment-828550780 > [2] > https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/main/raur/index.html#video-relay-services-vrs-and-video-remote-interpretation-vri > > > > Joshue O'Connor <mailto:joconnor@w3.org> > Tuesday 4 May 2021 12:32 > Hi all, > > We have had a comment from Gunnar about simplifying the note relating > to VRS/VRI in RAUR. He is suggesting that we change the title of the > issue to 'Text and Video relay services', and rather than mentioning > the situation in the UK/US - the Note simply says - " To successfully > connect video or text relay services should not require a complicated > sequence of user actions." [1] [2] > > I like this, as I think the heading change is simpler and same for the > note. Any objections or concerns to either proposal? > > Thanks > > Josh > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/177#issuecomment-828550780 > [2] > https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/main/raur/index.html#video-relay-services-vrs-and-video-remote-interpretation-vri > > -- Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2021 10:08:15 UTC