RE: RQTF agenda+ XAUR editorial updates

In general, I think the introductory material proposed in this draft offers suitable explanatory background to readers who are not specialists in disabilities or accessibility. My only substantive comment, and this is relatively minor, is that the third list item under section 3.9 should be rewritten for clarity.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshue O'Connor <>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2021 12:43
To: RQTF <>
Cc:; Michael Cooper <>
Subject: RQTF agenda+ XAUR editorial updates

Hi all,

In preparation for publication, I have made an editorial pass at the XAUR. I've not touched any of the user needs or requirements text just the background, supporting content etc. I've tidied up some text, made some edits to clarify and I think it reads much better.

These suggested edits are in this branch.;;sdata=87zgIb93LNwSXLq%2Fwegwu%2F173MSPfJ7A2IqqHatqeuY%3D&amp;reserved=0

Jason can we put this on the RQTF agenda for tomorrow to discuss?

All comments welcome, thanks


Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.


Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2021 18:20:30 UTC