Re: RAUR: New use case for total conversation clarification

Hi Jason,

[+ APA chairs]

On reflection - I'm thinking to put this into a holding pattern for the 
moment. I'm also remembering Janina had some reservations about this, 
and I'd like to discuss this with her before inputting into the draft.

We can discuss when we next meet, thanks.

Josh

> White, Jason J <mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>
> Thursday 8 October 2020 14:14
> Here is a description of a "total conversation" service, with a link 
> to the relevant ITU document:
> https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/studygroups/com16/accessibility/Pages/conversation.aspx
>
> The distinctive feature appears to be the combination of voice, video, 
> and real-time text (RTT) in the same real-time session.
>
> I would be interested in ideas as to what the most persuasive use 
> cases are, and how we should characterize the user need. For example, 
> one advantage is that the participants can make use of all three 
> communication modes without having to restart the RTC session and can 
> freely mix voice/video/RTT as desired.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 9:01 AM
> To: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
> Cc: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
> Subject: RAUR: New use case for total conversation clarification
>
> Hi all,
>
> This maybe one for Jason but I'm looking at the use case for Total 
> Conversation in my notes of actionable changes to RAUR [1]
>
> I'm a little unsure of how to frame this - should it be for example:
>
> DRAFT User Need for Total Conversation: A user needs to engage 
> real-time text, voice and video in a single session in various 
> combinations.
>
> Tbh, I'm not totally clear what that means? This also relates to the 
> issue #42 but the discussion seems rather circular.
>
> Any input appreciated, thanks
>
> Josh
>
> [1] 
> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fapa%2Fissues%2F105&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C4092c8b7e8d4499444fa08d86b8a2afa%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637377588466667856&amp;sdata=6EYVroKIGsoDMzNOfmhbVtryH2LxgUpELk%2FjZixbw18%3D&amp;reserved=0
> [2] 
> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fapa%2Fissues%2F42&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C4092c8b7e8d4499444fa08d86b8a2afa%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637377588466677850&amp;sdata=2%2BOFynu1qWZubSD6P5P8MINf9aGCxC7QkFa%2BFfeqwUA%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> --
> Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged 
> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual 
> for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you 
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not 
> disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the 
> contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any 
> other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
> Joshue O Connor <mailto:joconnor@w3.org>
> Thursday 8 October 2020 14:00
> Hi all,
>
> This maybe one for Jason but I'm looking at the use case for Total 
> Conversation in my notes of actionable changes to RAUR [1]
>
> I'm a little unsure of how to frame this - should it be for example:
>
> DRAFT User Need for Total Conversation: A user needs to engage 
> real-time text, voice and video in a single session in various 
> combinations.
>
> Tbh, I'm not totally clear what that means? This also relates to the 
> issue #42 but the discussion seems rather circular.
>
> Any input appreciated, thanks
>
> Josh
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/105
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/42
>


-- 
Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C)