- From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:26:12 +0100
- To: "Noble, Stephen" <steve.noble@pearson.com>, Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org>
- Cc: RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org>
Steve That's a interesting idea but I suspect only has minority recognition in the AAC Domain. I've ask the Task Force and also posted some thoughts on the GitHub Issue https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/69#issuecomment-607376676 Steve On 01/04/2020 22:24, Noble, Stephen wrote: > Hey Josh, > > I just thought I would add a quick observation on your question. After > doing a bit of searching in websites and journal articles that deal with > AAC, I have found that the phrase "symbol set" or "symbol sets" is a > fairly common way to refer to a collection of symbols used for AAC > purposes. However, I also found that the phrase "symbol libraries" > (especially in plural form) is also used, but "set" or "sets" seems to > be more commonly used by AAC professional groups like ASHA. But that may > be more of an American perspective. In conclusion, I would just say that > if we wanted alternate language if we used "library" or "libraries" I > think people would still know what we are talking about. > > Just another Steve's thoughts... > > *__* > > Steve Noble > Instructional Designer, Accessibility > Psychometrics & Testing Services > > *Pearson* > > 502 969 3088 > steve.noble@pearson.com <mailto:steve.noble@pearson.com> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Joshue O Connor <joconnor@w3.org> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:55 AM > *To:* Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org> > *Cc:* RQTF <public-rqtf@w3.org> > *Subject:* XAUR - Advice on language for Symbol Sets vs AAC > Hi Steve, > > [With RQTF group on cc] > > We've had a comment on Github about the XAUR that is interesting > regarding the use of the term 'Symbol Sets' as distinct from 'AAC'. > > Can you have a look at this GH issue and let me know your thoughts, or > discuss in COGA? > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_apa_issues_69&d=DwICaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=e0Vlq1-H9s-GydHZ8dXqhyYdB-jv9NvThaezSlozh9I&m=BGNNdbgFWjiW64eTPRvptciq6f64w-12nyvKprqrx1w&s=XWhQX6wD15U5YpeD-t93WdHrrfY6OVVgqNSBi4BnNjA&e= > > > I'm happy to take a steer from the COGA folks on appropriate language, > and I think it was a interesting catch from the commenter. Here is a > link to the relevant part of the XAUR document: > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.w3.org_TR_xaur_-23immersive-2Dpersonalisation&d=DwICaQ&c=0YLnzTkWOdJlub_y7qAx8Q&r=e0Vlq1-H9s-GydHZ8dXqhyYdB-jv9NvThaezSlozh9I&m=BGNNdbgFWjiW64eTPRvptciq6f64w-12nyvKprqrx1w&s=XxQZDdGYkCc7lEZKguc-Ey76fifvqPZsiQmvrxLCFD4&e= > > > Thanks in advance > > Josh > > -- > Emerging Web Technology Specialist/Accessibility (WAI/W3C) > >
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2020 08:26:19 UTC