Re: Charter [via Research Object for Scholarly Communication Community Group]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Dear all, Please take a look at our CG charter that I posted here. Any
> comments
> > are welcome! Cheers, Jun
>
> Drop "CG" or say "Community Group". I'm a member of two other groups
> but I did not know what "CG" stood for.
>

+1




> "This CG does NOT intend to produce a new specification to achieve the
> above goals." - perhaps add something like "but may collaborate on
> forming requirements for other, related specifications and
> vocabularies produced within or outside W3C groups"?
>

+1



> I am thinking of for instance Open Annotation [1], DCAT [2], Wf4Ever
> RO [3] - although I am not sure if they should be mentioned in the
> charter.
>

No need to name them in my opinion, as that might appear to be a
comprehensive list.

Would you like us to send a message out on the Open Annotation Community
Group list seeking additional participation, or wait until the charter is
finalized?

Rob