Re: [RIF] Okay to publish documents?

On 11/06/2012 06:46 PM, Boley, Harold wrote:
>
> I've approved them but noticed the minor problems below.
>

Thanks.

> -- Harold
>
> RIF Overview
>
> References should also cite RIF Primer 
> <http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-primer-20121028/>.
>

Can you fix this?

> RIF Combination with XML data
>
> RIF Combination with XML Data
>
>
>     6 Appendix A: Glossary (non-normative)
>
> Editor's Note: This section will be completed in a future draft.
>
> etc.
>

Christian?

> RIF Test Cases
>
> Leora Morgenstern <http://www-formal.stanford.edu/leora>, Courant 
> Institute of Mathematical Sciences
>
> Name URL? Affiliation at time of writing (now SAIC)?
>

I pinged Leora and she's fixed this.

       -- Sandro

> *From:*Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 28, 2012 5:37 PM
> *To:* RIF Working Group
> *Cc:* 'team-rif-chairs@w3.org'; Ivan Herman
> *Subject:* [RIF] Okay to publish documents?
>
> I've generated snapshots, and made a web poll where you can say if 
> you're okay with this going forward.
>
> My plan is to bug everyone every day this week until they vote.  
> :-)    You can vote "Abstain" if you really have no opinion and want 
> me to stop emailing you.
>
> The poll form is here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/38457/round-15/
>
> The documents are all linked from here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-overview-20121028/
>
> Obviously please speak up if you see any problems.
>
>        -- Sandro
>