Re: Review XML Data in RIF

looks good
michael


On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:22:26 -0400
Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thanx, Michael.
> 
> Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu> wrote on 20/10/2010 13:35:18:
> > 
> > I find that these two paragraphs are hard to understand. Both because of 
> the
> > sentence structure and also because at that time the reader has no idea 
> what
> > you are talking about. I think it is enough to just say that XML 
> combined
> > semantics constrains certain properties and gives them special 
> semantics. As a
> > result, XML+RIF where the XML document is empty is not the same as RIF 
> alone.
> > Something like that.
> 
> What about (in the "Overview" section):
> <<Combination with XML data and/or schema constrains the interpretation of 
> RIF formulas and give them special semantics. As a result, the semantics 
> of RIF combined with XML data and schema is not the same as the semantics 
> of RIF alone, even if the XML data and schema in the combination are 
> empty. >>
> 
> I removed the related paragraph in section 2.2.2. altogether. 
> 
> Is that better?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> IBM
> 9 rue de Verdun
> 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
> Tel./Fax: +33 1 49 08 29 81
> 
> 
> Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
> Compagnie IBM France
> Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
> Capital Social : 612.509.964 ?
> SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644
>

Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:01:01 UTC