- From: Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:01:05 +0200
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 09:02:14 UTC
Hi, I found a strange discrepancy in PRD. In the definition of assert fact actions [1], it is possible to assert class membership facts. Now, I understand that there is a shortcut syntax for asserts in the XML [2] and presentation [3] syntaxes. In particular, it's not necessary to write the "Assert" for positional and frame atoms. However, if one wants to assert a class membership formula, one is required to write the "Assert". Why is there this discrepancy? Was that an oversight? Cheers, Jos [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-prd-20100511/#Actions_2 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-prd-20100511/#ACTION_BLOCK [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-rif-prd-20100511/#Presentation_syntax_.28Informative.29 -- Jos de Bruijn Web: http://www.debruijn.net/ LinkedIn: http://at.linkedin.com/in/josdebruijn
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 09:02:14 UTC