- From: Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:17:59 +0200
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Axel has found an omission in the embedding of RIF-OWL2RL combinations into RIF [1]. In particular, the embedding of simple statements SubClassOf(A B) where A and B are class, was not considered. I corrected the problem by adding the new row 28 to the table in section 9.2.2.2 of SWC. I would argue that this is not a substantive change, but rather a bug-fix: the embedding does not work without the new row 28 in the table. Cheers, Jos [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Embedding_RIF-OWL_2_RL_Combinations [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Embedding_Normalized_OWL_2_RL -- Jos de Bruijn Web: http://www.debruijn.net/ LinkedIn: http://at.linkedin.com/in/josdebruijn
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 11:43:51 UTC