- From: Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:21:52 +0200
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Nevermind. I found out that the new row 28 is redundant with row 3, so there was actually no problem. It's been too long since I wrote the original embedding... Cheers, Jos On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@gmail.com> wrote: > Axel has found an omission in the embedding of RIF-OWL2RL combinations > into RIF [1]. In particular, the embedding of simple statements > SubClassOf(A B) > where A and B are class, was not considered. I corrected the problem > by adding the new row 28 to the table in section 9.2.2.2 of SWC. > I would argue that this is not a substantive change, but rather a > bug-fix: the embedding does not work without the new row 28 in the > table. > > > Cheers, Jos > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Embedding_RIF-OWL_2_RL_Combinations > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC#Embedding_Normalized_OWL_2_RL > > -- > Jos de Bruijn > Web: http://www.debruijn.net/ > LinkedIn: http://at.linkedin.com/in/josdebruijn > -- Jos de Bruijn Web: http://www.debruijn.net/ LinkedIn: http://at.linkedin.com/in/josdebruijn
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 11:22:45 UTC