On Apr 1, 2010, at 10:04 , Jos de Bruijn wrote: >> >> Extending the definition of Dataset towards something else then RDF Graphs >> is outside the scope of entailment extensions in SPARQL. > > It might make sense to bring it in scope. > Anyway, that's just my opinion. > Jos, strictly speaking as an administrator:-) this would require a rechartering of the group:-(, but it would also open some floodgates as for what syntaxes would be accepted for other purposes. There has been discussions about OWL serialization formats (manchester, etc); while technically perfectly possible, it would _really_ be outside the scope in the sense of jeopardizing the timely conclusion of the SPARQL work:-( Ivan > > Cheers, Jos ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2010 08:42:37 UTC