- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:35:41 +0200
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4AC396ED.8020403@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Thanks Ivan. Very helpful to have these problems spotted. I'm copying > the WG list for proper archiving. > o.k. [skip] > > Actually in that case the bug was a superflous ')' before the ':-', the > one at the end is right. I hope I never have to write any of this > Presentation Syntax! :-) > >> -------------- >> >> Also, though this is more editorial than other... My understanding of >> your encoding on the dt-type2 rule (in 4.4.3) is that >> >> ?lt[rdf:type->?ty rdf:type->rdfs:Literal] >> >> does actually slightly more than what dt-type2 requires, insofar as it >> also generates the (?lt rdf:type rdfs:Literal) which is, strictly >> speaking, not in dt-type2. Though it is _correct_ to add it there >> because there is a subsumption on that triple, maybe it deserves an >> editorial note... > > I don't agree with this one, though as you say it is more editorial. > > In the OWL 2 Profiles document dt-type2 says that it asserts > T(lt, rdf:type, dt) ""for each literal lt and each datatype dt supported > in OWL 2 RL such that the data value of lt is contained in the value > space of dt"". The issue is that rdfs:Literal is listed as a supported > datatype for OWL 2 RL and since all those literal values are contained > in rdfs:Literal then dt-type2 should in fact be asserting those triples > as well. > O.k. It may still be good to note that in the document itself, just to help casual readers like me:-) [skip] > >> I hope this is helpful... > > Very much so, thanks. > You are very welcome! Ivan > Dave > >> >> Cheers >> >> Ivan >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-owl-rl-20090929/ >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 17:32:31 UTC