- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:31:14 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "RIF \(E-mail\)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
p.s. ... the mapping to PStoXML would need some minor tweak probably as well? but that should be easy. Axel On 30 Sep 2009, at 16:29, Axel Polleres wrote: > The easiest and quickest way around this is: > > change: > Name:= NCName > to > Name:= NCName | ('"' UNICODESTRING '"') > > any objections against this? > > Axel > > On 30 Sep 2009, at 13:23, Stella Mitchell wrote: > >> >> >> As for the rest of this thread... I don't care about "the" PS. It's >> just there as a shorthand for specifying the semantics. I'll >> consider >> it a huge failure of the community if people ever actually use it >> (instead of better PS's that come along). >> >> >> My comment was that since the RIF PS defines a variable name to be >> an NCName, then, according to the specification, any variable name >> in an admissible RIF XML document must be an NCName. >> >> As a separate comment, the text in the paragraphs (BLD 2.6.1) >> following the EBNF formulation of the PS is now not consistent with >> the EBNF in how it describes argument names and variables. >> >> Stella >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> >> > > Profile names: We have profile names? I don't remember them. >> Where >> > > are >> > > they in the syntax? >> > > >> > >> > You are right, profiles are ANGLEBRACKIRIs, confused that with >> Dialect >> > names, cf. >> > >> > Dialect ::= 'Dialect' '(' Name ')' >> >> Ah, I missed that. As I've argued many times, included a dialect >> name >> in the syntax is big mistake. I thought people understood that by >> now, >> but I guess not. I think it's a mistake for FLD to support dialect >> designers macking this mistake, but I guess it's my fault for not >> noticing this before Last Call. Oh well. >> >> As for the rest of this thread... I don't care about "the" PS. It's >> just there as a shorthand for specifying the semantics. I'll >> consider >> it a huge failure of the community if people ever actually use it >> (instead of better PS's that come along). >> >> -- Sandro >> >> >> > > -- > Dr. Axel Polleres > Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of > Ireland, Galway > email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/ > > > -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 15:31:49 UTC