- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:01:17 +0100
- To: Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
Hi Christian,
> I corrected the draft wrt your editorial comments. See my own comments
> inlined.
>
> Dave Reynolds wrote on 26/09/2009 14:11:29:
> >
> > ** Editorial
> >
> > ** Section 1
> >
> > [Same hard to parse sentence in para6 that I commented on last time.]
> > s/Followingly, this/This/
> > s/possible, the corresponding XML schemas/where available the
> > corresponding XML schemas,/
>
> Replaced with:
> "Accordingly, this document specifies how a RIF document is combined
> with well-formed XML data sources and, where available, the
> corresponding XML schemas, identified using the <tt>rif:Import</tt>
> construct."
>
> Is that any better?
Yes, fine.
> > Delete para7 ("However, an instance of the data model can be ....")
> > since the rest of the document has dropped the direct mapping from
> > relational tables.
>
> I would prefer not to...
>
> Precisely because it remains the only place where this possibility is
> explicitly mentioned, after the relational table part of the example has
> bee removed.
But since the note doesn't specify how that can be done then mentioning
it is just a source of confusion. Perhaps an editor's note saying this
is intended to be supported in a future draft?
Cheers,
Dave
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:02:15 UTC