- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:37:53 +0200
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 19:39:20 UTC
>> 4- The translation does not consider plain literals with language tags; >> they should be translated typed literals with type rdf:PlainLiteral. > > Isn't that catered for automatically by use of the RIF-RDF combination > semantics? Yes, of course. When I wrote this comment I was thinking for a second that you translate the RDF graphs to RIF. However, since you keep the RDF in its native format, the RIF-RDF semantics takes care of the issue. Sorry for the mixup. Best, Jos
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 19:39:20 UTC