- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:02:14 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- cc: "RIF (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> yet another one (this is how far I got regarding ACTION-920 so far): > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#func:sublist_.28adapted_from_fn:subsequ > ence.29 > > 4.11.4.4 func:sublist (adapted from fn:subsequence) > > Note that this function as it stands so far is quite different from > fn:subsequence. First, fn:subsequence has no ?stop position argument, > but ?start ?length instead, second the domain for these two parameters > as defined for fn:subsequence is xs:double) > > I suggest to go with the way that fn:subsequence proposes, i.e. > ?start ?length > instead of > ?start stop > > In general, I am afraid I need some more time to check all of the list > functions, hope to be finished before the next telconf though. This decision was made a long time ago, and it's too late to change it (that is, it's after Last Call) without new information, etc. It's not like this is a bug; it's a coinflip decision we made as a group. -- Sandro
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 15:02:30 UTC