- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:22:02 +0100
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I updated 3.10 in the FAQ as follows: === Is RIF useful for reasoning about the provenance of claims expressed in RDF, eg. multiple named graphs in SPARQL that offer competing accounts of some situation? === If the differing named graphs are located in different web documents, then RIF with RDF compatibility (see [http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf- owl]) has an import mechanism that can be directed to the specific web documents and reason about them. More refined notions of import that allow to explicitly refer to facts from different imported documents per rule could be covered in extended RIF dialects.
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 08:22:44 UTC