Re: [OWL compatibility] #, ## in OWL compatibility

>>>> Also, doesn't 
>>>> BLD allow the range and domain of # to be much larger than OWL-DL does for type?  
>>> That has already been taken care of by the restrictions imposed by RIF/OWL-DL
>>> combo.  
>> Such restrictions are currently not there, but they could be added.
> 
> My understanding is that the restrictions are there
> for ...[rdfs:subclassOf->...] and we simply need to re-use them for ##.

Well, not for subclassof (this plays no role in RIF-OWL DL
compatibility), but it is there for rdf:type.


Cheers, Jos


> 
> 
> michael

-- 
                         debruijn@inf.unibz.it
Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/