- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:08:04 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > Sandro Hawke wrote: >> Shall we try to publish a WD of OWLRL in the next round? We're aiming >> for Sept 17, with publication decisions on the non-rec-track documents >> at the meeting on the 15th. > > It sounds like a good idea, though I may not be able to make the call on > the 15th. > >> I just added an abstract, just so the formatting would work, and I >> noticed that the intro says OWL RL has some datatypes RIF doesn't >> support; I think that's old, and section 4.4.1 is correct in saying they >> are now aligned. > > Thanks. I'll fix the intro and check what else might be outstanding. > Probably be able to look at that Tuesday this week. I've done some basic edits to bring the document into line. However, the current version still uses pred:isLiteral[Not]OfType which was dropped from DTB. This can be worked round but I don't have time to do this right now, so instead I've added an Editor's Note. That seems sufficient for a working draft. By the way, I went to check for the resolution which removed those predicates again but couldn't find it on our resolutions list. I could find the earlier resolution which added them. Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 17:08:56 UTC