- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:57:08 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote: > Jim Melton says XQuery is very uncomfortable with RIF Lists being > indexed from zero [1]. In our telecon, we were pretty unsure about it > ourselves. I suggest we mark this At Risk, and see what feedback we > get. Please reply and indicate support or objections... +1 > Also, I see our AtRisk numbering is broken: > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Special:Search?search=atrisk&fulltext=Search > > I see four different items there, and this indexing-from-zero will be a > fifth if we do it. Okay for me to renumber them (making Safeness be #4 > instead of a second #2) and make them link to a wiki page listing all of > them? (that's what we did with OWL 2. See, for example, > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-syntax-20090611/ ) +1 > I look for the chairs to tell me whether we have enough consensus on > this to publish later today (10/01), or need to wait until next week > (10/06). Well there's consensus so far :-) Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:58:04 UTC