- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:37:13 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote: >> 3.6.2 Predicates on Boolean Values >> >> I think we need is-true and is-false predicates for boolean in order >> to tie them in to true and false in RIF. > > I remember us talking about this at F2F13 and deciding people could just > use ="true"^^xs:boolean and ="false"^^xs:boolean. Maybe add a note to that effect. > >> 3.10.1 Functions on rdf:text >> >> "he pair 〈s, l〉 in the value space of rdf:text" >> >> The angle brackets come out as undefined characters in my browser. > > Hmmm. OWL stumbled on this too, deciding it was an IE7 problem. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2009Apr/0398.html I use firefox. > >> 3.11.1 Position Numbering >> >> "Positions beyond the end of the list are adjusted by the builtins to >> point to the first position after the end of the list. " >> >> That seems weird. What's the use case for that? Negative indexes are >> fine, I don't see they imply indexes beyond the end are OK. > > It's not really connected to negative indexes. The reason to have this > is that it allows you to append without first asking the length of the > list, as long as you know some number greater than the length of the > list: > > insert-before(List(0 1 2 3 4) 1000000000 99) = List(0 1 2 3 4 99) > > This is, of course, a hack. I'd support adding append, and then I'd be > okay with removing this feature. (The one other place it comes into play > is in sublist; there, too, you can use some big number as a way to get > the 3-argument version to act like the 2-argument version. Not terribly > useful.) (Hold on, one of the pencils on my desk is a little crooked. Ah there. Perfect) I dislike this immensely. Was there objection to adding append to our list operators? -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 12:37:56 UTC