********* NOTICE ********** My new email address at IBM is: csma@fr.ibm.com My ILOG email address will not be forwarded after June 8 ***************************** Michael Kifer wrote on 05/05/2009 04:56:20: > > I don't think we should include Nio in FLD. First, KBDSTRING is already an > extensibility mechanism. Second, inflationary negation is not a logical > negation and so it is not suitable for FLD unless FLD is extended to FRD (for > all of RIF), which I don't see happening on the horizon. > Finally, I think Nio is too cute and too uninformative. I'd propose iNeg. +1 to all, including using INeg rather than Nio. INeg is, indeed, what the PRD TF agreed to use for PRD. Christian Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above: Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400 Courbevoie RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 609.751.783,30 ? SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 08:03:12 UTC